Jeudi 20 septembre 2007 4 20 /09 /Sep /2007 11:36

Publié par Helsinkin Sanomat

Les évêques finlandais revendiquent le droit de critiquer la politique vis à vis de l'accueil des étrangers dans leur pays. Ils demandent plus de justice et d'humanité. Ils citent en exemple l'Eglise de Suède, en avance d'une vingtaine d'années selon eux - dans la défense des demandeurs d'asile.

Heureusement pour nous français, ils ne s'expriment pas sur lapolitique de Sarkozy en ce domaine.


Lutheran bishops call for more humane legislation on foreigners

Archbishop defends church's right to criticise officials


Lutheran bishops call for more humane legislation on foreigners
 print this
Bishops of Finland's Evangelical-Lutheran Church are calling for better treatment of asylum seekers.
     "This (the treatment of applicants) can be a question of life and death", noted Gustav Björkstrand, the Bishop of Porvoo at a press conference linked with the Bishops' Conference being held in Karjaa.
     "My own starting point would be to change legislation in a more humane direction, so that it would better correspond with people's sense of justice", he said.
     The issue came up during unofficial discussions concerning topical issues. Lutheran congregations in Turku and Kuopio have given protection to asylum-seekers whose applications have been rejected.
      Jorma Vuorio, Director-General of the Directorate of Immigration, has criticised church representatives for trying to "give instructions" to officials, and for using the media for their own purposes.
     
Archbishop Jukka Paarma defended the right of the church, as well as civic organisations to criticise officials, and to take part in social debate.
     "That strengthens democracy, and can change legislation", he pointed out.
      As Parma sees it, the church is not deliberately "looking for a conflict" with the state when it protects asylum seekers and draws attention to the shortcomings of legislation.
      "In line with its calling, the church wants to help people in distress. At the same time we are trying to work together with officials."
      In Paarma's view, this means that the church can offer protection for an asylum seeker, while not actually hiding the person from the authorities. Archbishop Paarma nevertheless pointed out that history also knows extreme cases in which the church has had to actually go against worldly power.
     
Espoo Bishop Mikko Heikka took as an example the church in Sweden, which is "about twenty years ahead of us".
      "They have successfully both defended individual asylum seekers, and affected legislation."
      "In this respect, Sweden's path is also ours", Heikka said.


Previously in HS International Edition:
  Court blocks forced repatriation of Iranian Kurdish woman (10.9.2007)
  Iranian Kurd protected by church to be deported (4.9.2007)

Helsingin Sanomat

Par deslilas10 - Publié dans : Pays scandinaves et nordiques
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 2 commentaires
Jeudi 20 septembre 2007 4 20 /09 /Sep /2007 09:55
Par deslilas10 - Publié dans : Photo
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 0 commentaires
Mercredi 19 septembre 2007 3 19 /09 /Sep /2007 10:00
P1050647.JPG
P1050650.JPG
Par deslilas10 - Publié dans : Photo
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 0 commentaires
Mercredi 19 septembre 2007 3 19 /09 /Sep /2007 09:45
La Fondation EUROFOUND  vient de mettre en ligne une étude importante sur les pratiques de flexibilité du temps de travail dans les différents pays d'Europe. Selon ses résultats la flexibilité peut "booster" les preformances économiques encore faut il que cette flexibilité soit équilibrée et ne se fasse pas au détriment des salariés ou des entreprise.
Les entreprises nordiques sont dans cette situation favorable d'une flexibilité importante avec un bénéfice important pour les salariés.
La France fait d'ores et déjà partie du groupe de pays ayant introduit beaucoup de flexibilité en majorant l'intérêt des entreprises au détriment des salariés.

http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/htmlfiles/ef0739.htm

Eurofound News September 2007

Important notice!

If you would like to receive Eurofound News by email (10 issues a year), please sign up now.

Flexible working can boost performance

Flexible working time arrangements are more likely to be found in organisations operating in Nordic countries, in large organisations and in the areas of commercial services, public administration, health services and transport. While establishments with such arrangements perform somewhat better and show higher rates of employment growth, the type of flexibility implemented in the establishment appears to be as important as the extent of flexibility offered.

These are some of the findings of a recently published Eurofound report, Working time flexibility in European companies. The report is one of a series using data from Eurofound’s Establishment Survey on Working Time 2004–2005, which aimed to analyse working time arrangements in the European workplace by interviewing personnel managers and (where available) employee representatives. This report focuses on the combinations of different working time practices at establishment level and looks at the effects of different arrangements on company performance.

Types of flexibility

The report stresses that various forms of, and reasons for, flexibility exist: an establishment may put in place working time flexibility to benefit the company’s production needs or to improve the work–life balance of employees, or for a combination of both reasons. The report distinguishes six types of establishment, according to their combinations of different flexible arrangements.

The report stresses the importance of this more nuanced analysis of flexibility, rather than using a simplistic ‘high–low’ continuum or axis. A company or country might have high levels of flexibility, but might have forms of flexibility in place that meet only companies’ needs.

Differences between Member States

While 36% of all companies surveyed in Europe can be categorised as high-flexibility organisations, the proportion is much higher in Finland and Sweden, where 59% and 57% are of the high-flexibility type. By contrast, in Belgium, the Czech Republic, France and the UK many companies have high levels of flexibility oriented towards benefiting the company. Meanwhile, the southern Mediterranean countries along with Belgium, Hungary, Luxembourg and Slovenia have high proportions of companies with little in the way of flexible arrangements.

Sectoral differences

When sectoral differences were examined, it was found that public administration, financial intermediation, real estate, renting and business activities, electricity, gas and water supply were among the sectors with high levels of worker-oriented flexibility. By contrast, the construction sector has an above-average number of low-flexibility companies, while the health and social work sectors have high levels of company-oriented flexibility.

The report also finds that other company characteristics are associated with type and extent of flexibility. For instance, establishments that can reliably predict variations in workload and that have a greater proportion of high-skilled employees are more likely to have high levels of worker-oriented flexibility. By contrast, establishments that have little variation of workload, and have fewer young employees, are more likely to be of the low flexibility type.




Eurofound News September 2007

Important notice!

If you would like to receive Eurofound News by email (10 issues a year), please sign up now.

Flexible working can boost performance

Flexible working time arrangements are more likely to be found in organisations operating in Nordic countries, in large organisations and in the areas of commercial services, public administration, health services and transport. While establishments with such arrangements perform somewhat better and show higher rates of employment growth, the type of flexibility implemented in the establishment appears to be as important as the extent of flexibility offered.

These are some of the findings of a recently published Eurofound report, Working time flexibility in European companies. The report is one of a series using data from Eurofound’s Establishment Survey on Working Time 2004–2005, which aimed to analyse working time arrangements in the European workplace by interviewing personnel managers and (where available) employee representatives. This report focuses on the combinations of different working time practices at establishment level and looks at the effects of different arrangements on company performance.

Types of flexibility

The report stresses that various forms of, and reasons for, flexibility exist: an establishment may put in place working time flexibility to benefit the company’s production needs or to improve the work–life balance of employees, or for a combination of both reasons. The report distinguishes six types of establishment, according to their combinations of different flexible arrangements.

The report stresses the importance of this more nuanced analysis of flexibility, rather than using a simplistic ‘high–low’ continuum or axis. A company or country might have high levels of flexibility, but might have forms of flexibility in place that meet only companies’ needs.

Differences between Member States

While 36% of all companies surveyed in Europe can be categorised as high-flexibility organisations, the proportion is much higher in Finland and Sweden, where 59% and 57% are of the high-flexibility type. By contrast, in Belgium, the Czech Republic, France and the UK many companies have high levels of flexibility oriented towards benefiting the company. Meanwhile, the southern Mediterranean countries along with Belgium, Hungary, Luxembourg and Slovenia have high proportions of companies with little in the way of flexible arrangements.

Sectoral differences

When sectoral differences were examined, it was found that public administration, financial intermediation, real estate, renting and business activities, electricity, gas and water supply were among the sectors with high levels of worker-oriented flexibility. By contrast, the construction sector has an above-average number of low-flexibility companies, while the health and social work sectors have high levels of company-oriented flexibility.

The report also finds that other company characteristics are associated with type and extent of flexibility. For instance, establishments that can reliably predict variations in workload and that have a greater proportion of high-skilled employees are more likely to have high levels of worker-oriented flexibility. By contrast, establishments that have little variation of workload, and have fewer young employees, are more likely to be of the low flexibility type.

Par deslilas10 - Publié dans : Travail
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 0 commentaires
Mardi 18 septembre 2007 2 18 /09 /Sep /2007 19:22

chat, chat, chat

 

Get

 

 
Par deslilas10 - Publié dans : Humour
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 0 commentaires
Mardi 18 septembre 2007 2 18 /09 /Sep /2007 19:19

Encore un article du Spiegel qui épingle les nouvelles positions internationales de l'équipe Sarkozy et son alignement sur la politique contestée de Bush.

SPIEGEL ONLINE - September 18, 2007, 01:14 PM
URL: http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,506396,00.html

THE WORLD FROM BERLIN

France's New Hawks

It used to be that France would respond with a predictable "non" to any saber-rattling coming out of the US. Now, though, Paris seems eager to lead the way and has taken clear aim at Iran. The bellicosity is making German commentators nervous.

 

The International Atomic Energy Agency is not impressed with France's new rhetoric.
REUTERS

The International Atomic Energy Agency is not impressed with France's new rhetoric.

Sometimes it's not the message, but the messenger who delivers it. After spending much of this decade going head to head with the US over its invasion of Iraq due to nuclear weapons suspicions, France seems to be joining American bellicosity when it comes to those same suspicions about Iran. On French radio on Sunday, French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner said that it is time to "prepare ourselves for the worst" and indicated that he was talking about a possible war with Iran.

 

The remarks are simply the most recent indication that France under new President Nicolas Sarkozy is turning its back on the almost reflexive anti-US stance of his predecessor Jacques Chirac. And they have not been universally well-received. On Monday, the UN's head nuclear watchdog Mohamed ElBaradei blasted Kouchner, saying that diplomacy is still the best route and warned against "hyping" the issue.

"There are rules on how to use force," ElBaradei said "and I would hope that everybody would have gotten the lesson after the Iraq situation, where 700,000 innocent civilians have lost their lives on the suspicion that a country has nuclear weapons."

Kouchner also indicated that the European Union might begin looking into imposing its own sanctions against Iran, should the UN continue to be unable to strengthen those currently in place. China and Russia -- both of which wield vetoes on the UN Security Council -- have been reluctant to take a harder line against Iran, which is widely suspected of trying to develop nuclear weapons.

German commentators, still scratching their heads about Sarkozy's recent offer of nuclear weapons to Germany, take a look at the new French position on Tuesday.

Center-left Süddeutsche Zeitung on Tuesday points out:

"The comments don't come from just anybody. They come from the foreign minister of a nuclear power with a UN Security Council veto; they come from Germany's closest ally; they come from a European Union member."

"There is really only one possible explanation for Kouchner's comments: He wants to ratchet up the pressure. Germany, which is tentative about new sanctions, will feel it, and Russia and China will both be forced to realize that a new storm is brewing. Using the word 'war' accelerates the escalation relative to Iran, and is the most obvious indication yet of a radical change of course in the French Foreign Ministry. But it wasn't an intelligent choice of word."

Conservative Die Welt, which in recent years has often seemed like the only German daily to support US foreign policy, falls all over itself with glee on Tuesday:

"The most recent surveys of the German Marshall Fund show that 56 percent of Germans think that a nuclear-armed Iran would threaten Europe. But only 22 percent of those asked could imagine military action against Tehran. The result is that all German politicians are relying on negotiations in the hope that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad will collapse under the wall of words."

"If he doesn't, most here seem to hope that Germany will retreat into the background. ... But this time it will be more difficult. Contrary to last time, with the invasion of Saddam Hussein's Iraq, it's not just the Americans (Republicans as well as Democrats) who are pleading for an uncompromising position against Iran ... ."

 

"France has made a U-turn in its policy toward Iran and in its position with regard to the United States. It will lead to an end of the classic rivalry between Paris and Washington. In addition, the French government is apparently ready to, if need be, move against Iran even without the Security Council. One can only hope that Paris can influence Berlin's course too. Because Iran is a threat -- and it is a threat that affects Europe as well."

 

Left-leaning Die Tageszeitung likewise follows its political leanings on Tuesday:

"Kouchner wants his words to be understood in Tehran, Washington and Jerusalem: As a threat of war against Iran, or at least as a signal of France's preparedness to support America's possible war against Iran. The reactions show that the message has been comprehended in the three capitals. In Berlin, for its part, the interpretation of Kouchner's remark as a threat of war has been completely rejected."

"But there is one question that remains: Is France seriously weighing a military option against Iran? Or are the bellicose rhetoric and demands for fresh sanctions merely attempts to hinder, as Sarkozy put it in his first major foreign policy speech in August, having to one day face the 'catastrophic decision' between an Iran with the bomb or having to bomb Iran? If that is, in fact, France's game, then it doesn't seem to be working, at least in Iran. Kouchner's words have strengthened the hand of the hardliners and those in favor of atomic weapons. And that increases the likelihood of war."

-- Charles Hawley, 12:20 p.m. CET

 


© SPIEGEL ONLINE 2007
All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with the permission of SPIEGELnet GmbH

 


Related SPIEGEL ONLINE links:

Not a Warmonger: Kouchner Plays Down Iran 'War' Remarks (09/18/2007)
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,506361,00.html
Thanks but No Thanks: Sarko's Nuke Offer Bombs with Berlin (09/17/2007)
http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/0,1518,506124,00.html
SPIEGEL Interview with Mohamed ElBaradei: 'We Are Moving Rapidly Towards an Abyss' (09/03/2007)
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,503841,00.html

 

 

Par deslilas10 - Publié dans : Politique
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 0 commentaires
Lundi 17 septembre 2007 1 17 /09 /Sep /2007 14:15

et la blesse en la désignant comme une "femme venant de l'est" en évoquant sa naissance en RDA.


DER SPIEGEL 38/2007 - September 17, 2007

URL: http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/0,1518,506124,00.html

THANKS BUT NO THANKS

Sarko's Nuke Offer Bombs with Berlin

By Ralf Beste and Stefan Simons

Ever since Nicolas Sarkozy became French president, he has been bewildering the German government with one controversial idea after another. The latest shocker? The new man in Paris has offered German Chancellor Angela Merkel French nuclear weapons.

 

Sarkozy suggested to Merkel that maybe Germany would like a stake in France's nuclear arsenal, such as this nuclear submarine.
REUTERS

Sarkozy suggested to Merkel that maybe Germany would like a stake in France's nuclear arsenal, such as this nuclear submarine.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy didn't mention the bomb right away. Instead, he took a little detour by way of atomic energy: Whoever is serious about averting global warming should build more nuclear power plants, he told Chancellor Angela Merkel and Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier during last week's informal meeting in Meseberg palace, the German government's guest residence north of Berlin. Then came the surprise offer.

 

Seeing as they were discussing the benefits of all things atomic, the French president continued, he had another suggestion as well: Because the French nuclear umbrella protected France's neighbors as well as La Grande Nation itself, perhaps the Germans would consider taking a political stake in the French atomic arsenal?

Both the chancellor and her foreign minister were speechless. The idea of possessing nuclear weapons is taboo in Germany. Sarzoky's predecessor Jacques Chirac cautiously brought up the issue 12 years ago, but he quickly realized it was pointless to pursue it.

Steinmeier was the first to regain his composure, explaining that Germany did not seek to become a nuclear power, which is why the country had signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty in 1975. Merkel offered a friendly smile and backed up her foreign minister.

A Series of Surprises

Ever since Sarkozy took office four months ago, he's been constantly surprising Berlin with one initiative after the next. Some might be useful, but the hyperactive president also has the tendency to approach sensitive diplomatic issues with all the finesse of an Energizer bunny. He's so frantic that French newspapers have received pleas to introduce at least one Sarkozy-free day a week -- something which would no doubt go down well in Berlin.

 

The days where Sarkozy's political hyperactivity was dismissed as simply exuberance from being fresh in office are long gone. Merkel, Steinmeier and German Finance Minister Peer Steinbrück have all been surprised, stymied, annoyed and flabbergasted time and time again by his proposals. But even worse is when Sarkozy appears to deliberately pick fights with Berlin simply because he doesn't like the way the Germans deal with him.

 

It's no surprise, then, that Steinmeier was careful to decline the offer of French nuclear weapons as politely as possible. He wanted to avoid provoking Sarkozy at all costs, since the French leader has made it extremely clear that he doesn't care much for uppity German ministers.

The foreign minister's cabinet colleague Steinbrück learned that lesson the hard way a few weeks ago, after he dared contradict Sarkozy during a discussion about the independence of the European Central Bank at an EU meeting. While Steinbrück was speaking, Sarkozy waved over the German finance minister's deputy, Thomas Mirow, and railed at him in French that he should stop his boss, saying, "That's not how one speaks to a president." Bemused, Mirow sat back down and kept quiet.

Sarkozy then proceeded to telephone Merkel to demand that Steinbrück be publicly reprimanded. But she pointed out that she could hardly criticize one of her ministers simply because he was defending the German government's official position on the matter.

 

Sarkozy and Merkel looked the best of chums at Meseberg last week. But behind the scenes, Merkel is apparently getting on Sarko's nerves and the hyperactive French president is bewildering the Germans.
DDP

Sarkozy and Merkel looked the best of chums at Meseberg last week. But behind the scenes, Merkel is apparently getting on Sarko's nerves and the hyperactive French president is bewildering the Germans.

The Frenchman angrily related the story to the outgoing governor of Bavaria, Edmund Stoiber, who recently visited Sarkozy at the Élysée Palace in Paris. Shortly thereafter, it was leaked to German newspapers that Merkel was "increasingly getting on Sarkozy's nerves."

 

But the Germans and French are not just clashing over questions of style -- issues of substance are also leading to cracks in the European Union's most important partnership. The German Foreign Ministry was completely surprised by French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner's recent visit to Baghdad to express France's new willingness to support the Americans there. Sarkozy was also keen to be the hero in the release of five Bulgarian nurses held for years by Libya, even though the German government played a key role in brokering a deal. He then proceeded to use the occasion to announce a controversial nuclear deal with Libya -- naturally without informing his EU partners in advance.

It's possible that Europe's legendary Franco-German motor might shift into neutral for a while. Sarkozy has replaced consultations with a tendency to dictate. The implied threat for Berlin is clear: Either you go along with French plans, or Paris will go it alone.

And that could lead to the next showdown. Sarkzoy wants to force the EU to impose extra sanctions on Iran. But instead of working with Germany on a plan of action as a preferred partner, Paris simply informed Berlin of its intentions via a diplomatic note, as if it were any other EU member.

During the meeting at Meseberg, Steinmeier pointed out that the Germans had already drastically reduced their business interests in Iran. Instead of demanding more sanctions, Paris should call on French banks, energy firms and carmakers to scale back to German levels first. Since then, the tone has become somewhat harsher between the two European heavyweights.

 

Diplomats in Paris are spreading the story that Merkel, a conservative, supports the Sarkozy initiative, but she's being held back by her center-left Social Democratic ministers Steinmeier and Steinbrück -- something which Berlin denies.

 

Now both governments are trying to avoid a further escalation of the Franco-German spat. "Relations between the two are really good," claims a Merkel confidant.

But Sarkozy will need some practice at sounding conciliatory. He told his cabinet last Wednesday that Merkel was "a woman from the east," in reference to her East German roots.

The Élysée Palace quickly tried to smooth over the gaffe: Apparently Sarkozy was merely trying to point out that growing up in East Germany meant Merkel did not have the "same affection for France as people from the neighboring Rhineland."




© DER SPIEGEL 38/2007
All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with the permission of SPIEGELnet GmbH


Par deslilas10 - Publié dans : Politique
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 0 commentaires
Lundi 17 septembre 2007 1 17 /09 /Sep /2007 07:56
Madame, Monsieur,

Nous vous remercions vivement d'avoir signé la pétition pour des services publics de qualité accessibles à tous. Plus de 400,000 personnes ont déjà apporté leur soutien à notre combat contre la politique de libéralisation de la Commission européenne. Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin de mieux faire connaître notre initiative en faveur des services publics.

Les nouvelles tentatives de la Commission européenne pour libéraliser certains services publics - poste, transports, énergie, services sociaux, santé, etc. - montrent l'urgence de protéger les services publics en Europe.

Pour vous informer sur ces nouvelles menaces qui pèsent sur les services publics, nous avons mis en place une rubrique internet Nouveaux défis!

Nous vous invitons à consulter cette rubrique et à diffuser largement la pétition autour de vous.

Meilleures salutations,

Józef Niemiec
Secrétaire confédéral de la CES


Nouveaux défis pour les services publics !


Pour des services publics de qualité, accessibles à tous

L’objectif de la pétition est de collecter un million de signatures pour pousser la Commission européenne à proposer une législation afin de créer les conditions pour la mise en oeuvre des droits et des besoins fondamentaux, tels que les droits à la santé, à la formation, à la culture, aux transports, à la communication, à l’information, à l’énergie, à l’eau, à la sécurité alimentaire, à l’environnement, au logement, etc.

Les services dans l’UE ont besoin de règles claires, afin de garantir à tous la continuité de l’approvisionnement et un accès équitable. Ces services doivent être d’un niveau de qualité élevé, être accessibles à tous à un prix abordable et faire l’objet d’un contrôle démocratique impliquant tant les consommateurs que les travailleurs de ces secteurs cruciaux.

A l’instar d’autres acteurs clés, la Confédération européenne des syndicats (CES) a déjà présenté un projet de législation cadre , donnant ainsi à la Commission une base de travail. Mais à ce jour, en dépit de demandes répétées, aucune proposition n’a été formulée. Par le biais de cette pétition, la CES demande à la Commission européenne de prendre des mesures afin de promouvoir et de renforcer les services publics.

- Signer la pétition

Une législation cadre pour faire face aux tentatives de libéralisation et de privatisation

- Communication de la Commission européenne relative aux services sociaux

Le besoin d’une législation cadre est d’autant plus urgent que la Commission européenne vient de publier une communication relative aux services sociaux. Dans ce document, elle semble vouloir soumettre aux règles du marché des services très larges tels que ceux relatifs à l’accompagnement du chômage, de la toxicomanie, de la rupture familiale, à la formation et réinsertion professionnelles, au logement social, ou encore les activités visant à assurer la réinsertion des personnes ayant des besoins à long terme liés à un handicap ou un problème de santé.

- Autres projets de libéralisations : postes, transports, énergie, etc.

D’autres services sont également de nouveaux confrontés à des projets de libéralisation. Dans le domaine des services postaux, la Commission européenne propose d’ouvrir totalement ce secteur à la concurrence d’ici le 1er janvier 2009 et de supprimer le monopole sur les plis de moins de 50 grammes, dispositif qui permet une égalité de traitement et un accès à tous à ce service d’intérêt général, grâce notamment à la péréquation tarifaire et géographique. En ce qui concerne les transports, le « troisième paquet ferroviaire » envisage notamment de libéraliser le transport international de voyageurs d’ici 2010. Et la Commission a récemment tenté de séparer les activités de production, de transport et de distribution d’énergie. D’autres projets visant à accroitre la libéralisation de certains secteurs sont annoncés, comme par exemple dans les télécoms.

- Manque de clarté juridique

L’externalisation des tâches réalisées jusqu’à maintenant par le secteur public entraine une concurrence croissante d’opérateurs différents. Les États se réservent, dans ce contexte, le rôle de régulateurs, et se voient soumis de plus en plus aux règles européennes du marché intérieur qui réduisent leur champ de manœuvre. La jurisprudence de la Cour européenne de justice intervient dans ce domaine, en l’absence de règles plus claires décidées par les politiques, pour résoudre des conflits entre les obligations de mission publique et les libertés du marché unique. Cette situation n’est pas soutenable, au moins pour deux raisons. La jurisprudence est susceptible d’évolution, et en plus, elle est appliquée à des cas concrets, donc l’insécurité juridique persiste.

- Signer la pétition

- Résolution de la CES : Pour une directive-cadre sur les services d’intérêt (économique) général

- Projet de cadre européen pour garantir et développer les services d’intérêt économique général

- Fiche thématique : Services publics - services d’intérêt (économique) général – SI(E)G

 
Par deslilas10 - Publié dans : Europe sociale
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 0 commentaires
Dimanche 16 septembre 2007 7 16 /09 /Sep /2007 12:26
Tiken Jah Fakoly Ft. Soprano / Ouvrez les frontières 
taille du player : Aperçu


Ouvrez les frontières
laissez entrer la paix

-Chacun son hémisphère
et son fuseau horaire
chacun vit dans son coin
sans regarder personne au loin
mais pourtant il y a du monde
il y a des rencontres
où le cœur a des promesses
qu'il ne tient pas

-Ouvrez, ouvrez les frontières
laissez entrer la paix
ouvrez, ouvrez la lumière
voyez on se connaît
on vit des journées entières
sur la même planète
cloués dans l'indifférence
comme des chiens de faïence

-Derrière les différences
et les guerres d'influence
en noir, en jaune, en blanc
y'a toujours un visage d'enfant
un regard qui interroge
les yeux de tous les hommes
une voix qui leur demande
où va le monde

-Ouvrez, ouvrez les frontières
laissez entrer la paix
ouvrez, ouvrez la lumière
voyez on se connaît
on vit des journées entières
sur la même planète
cloués dans l'indifférence
comme des chiens de faïence

-Chantez, chantez pour la terre
gens d'ici et d'ailleurs
chantez, chantez pour la terre
demain sera meilleur
on est tous des partenaires
de la même espérance
elle court dans les savanes
dans les villes et les campagnes

-Ouvrez, ouvrez les frontières
laissez entrer la paix
ouvrez, ouvrez la lumière
voyez on se connaît
on vit des journées entières
sur la même planète
on est là pour vivre ensemble
ouvrez, ouvrez les frontières

-Ouvrez, ouvrez les frontières
laissez entrer la paix
ouvrez, ouvrez la lumière
voyez on se connaît
on vit des journées entières
sur la même planète
on est là pour vivre ensemble
ouvrez, ouvrez les frontières
taille du player : Aperçu
Par deslilas10 - Publié dans : Video
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 0 commentaires
Vendredi 14 septembre 2007 5 14 /09 /Sep /2007 10:04
sur Ilkka Matila
Les 18, 25 et 29 septembre 2007 à l'Institut finlandais




Professionnels du cinéma finlandais contemporain à la rencontre du public parisien

L’Institut finlandais invite de nouveau le public parisien à découvrir une personnalité du cinéma finlandais à travers une rencontre et des projections de films. Cette fois-ci, c’est l’un des producteurs les plus ambitieux de son pays, Ilkka Matila, qui viendra parler de sa profession et partager ses expériences concernant trois films programmés le 18, le 25 et le 29 septembre 2007.

Une rencontre avec Ilkka Matila aura lieu le 18 septembre à 19 h 30, dans le cadre de la projection de L’Année du loup (Suden vuosi, Olli Saarela, 2007), une histoire d’amour qui a pour cadre le milieu universitaire d’Helsinki.

La Meilleure des mères (Äideistä parhain, Klaus Härö, 2005) sera au programme le 25 septembre. Ce film dramatique évoque le destin d’un enfant finlandais envoyé en Suède pour se réfugier de la Seconde Guerre mondiale. Le troisième film au programme, Rölli et l’Esprit de la forêt (Rölli ja metsänhenki,Olli Saarela, 2001), qui sera présenté le 29 septembre, est un conte fantastique pour petits et grands, adapté d’une très populaire série télévisée finlandaise pour enfants.

Ces trois films ont tous été produits par Ilkka Matila, cofondateur et directeur général adjoint de la plus grande et plus internationale des sociétés de production finlandaises, MRP Matila Röhr Productions Oy. Elu Producteur de l’année en Finlande pour son travail sur le film La Meilleure des mères, Ilkka Matila est un personnage-clé dans le cinéma finlandais actuel, qui s’oriente de plus en plus vers le marché international.   

Précédemment, l’Institut finlandais avait invité la décoratrice Minna Santakari et l’actrice Minna Haapkylä (vue sur les écrans français dans Selon Charlie de Nicole Garcia et dans Le Serpent d’Eric Barbier) à dévoiler à son public les secrets de leurs métiers respectifs.





Entrée (sans réservation, dans la limite des places disponibles) : 3,50 euros


www.institut-finlandais.asso.fr
Institut finlandais
60 rue des Ecoles
75005 Paris - France
Tél. +33 (0)1 40 51 89 09

Par deslilas10 - Publié dans : Culture
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 0 commentaires

Calendrier

Février 2012
L M M J V S D
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29        
<< < > >>

Recherche

Syndication

  • Flux RSS des articles
Créer un blog gratuit sur over-blog.com - Contact - C.G.U. - Signaler un abus - Articles les plus commentés